ABSTRACT
Background & Aim: Hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) are infused for hematopoietic reconstitution in the setting of malignancy and inherited or acquired hematological deficiencies. Given the global COVID-19 pandemic, the recommendation was made to cryopreserve all allogeneic HPCs to protect recipients by allowing for subclinical cases of infection to present prior to infusion. As such, consideration of HPC stability programs (SP) and their rigor has risen. The goal of a SP is to prove the rigor of a transplant program’s cryopreservation and storage standard operating procedures so that sufficient HPC viability and potency are maintained for engraftment. SPs are also required by accreditation agencies such as AABB and FACT. Many HPC SP have validated product expirations out to 10 years. Here we share our SP to 20 years with ongoing validation for 30-year expiration. Methods, Results & Conclusion: Program Design: Current testing frequency of our SP is within the first year, and then at three-year intervals (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 19, 21). Our rolling SP includes 2 additional (Figure Presented) Fig. 1.Current vs proposed HPC product testing and cryopreseveration schema. samples tested at 0, 5, & 9 years, then at 3-year intervals (12, 15, 19, 21, 24, 27, 30). SP samples are collected from donors requiring additional days to reach their goal but are in excess at the conclusion of collection (e.g., Day 1 collection 4.5e6 CD34+ cells/Kg, goal 5e6 CD34+ cells/ Kg). Samples are collected on a quarterly basis with ten 1mL cryovials being drawn (Figure 1). CD3+ and CD34+ viabilities are tested after cryopreservation with an acceptable threshold set at ≥75% for both. Conclusion: We are validating our SP up to 20 years with intention to validate to 30 years. Thus far, our SP reveals product age has no to low correlation with engraftment, suggesting maintenance of potency over time in a cryopreservative of 10% DMSO, 10% plasma, and 30% PlasmaLyte-A with a final cell concentration of ≤3×108 NC/mL (Figure 2). Successful engraftment has been seen in all recipients. Transplant programs should modify testing frequency, acceptance criteria, and product expiration to meet individual need while working towards standardization in the field. Given the frequency of DLIs and 2nd/3rd transplants at the Mayo Clinic, a 30-year SP reflects the need of our transplant program.(Figure Presented)Fig. 2 . ANC and platelet engraftment dates for ≥10-year-old HPC products
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted breast cancer control through shortterm declines in screening, delays in diagnosis and reduced/delayed treatments. We projected the impact of COVID-19 on future breast cancer mortality.Methods: Three established Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) models projected the impact of pandemic-related care disruptions on breast cancer mortality between 2020 and 2030 vs. prepandemic care patterns. Based on Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium data, we modeled reductions in mammography screening utilization, delays in symptomatic cancer diagnosis, and reduced use of chemotherapy for women with early-stage disease for the first six months of the pandemic with return to pre-pandemic patterns after that time. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the effect of key model parameters, including the duration of the pandemic impact. Results: By 2030, the models project 1,297 (model range: 1,054-1,900) cumulative excess deaths related to reduced screening;1,325 (range: 266-2,628) deaths from delayed diagnosis of symptomatic women, and 207 (range: 146-301) deaths from reduced chemotherapy use for early-stage cancer. Overall, the models predict 2,487 (range 1,713- 4,875) excess deaths, representing a 0.56% (range: 0.36%-0.99%) cumulative increase over deaths that would be expected by 2030 in the absence of the pandemic's disruptions. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the impact on mortality would approximately double if the disruptions lasted for a 12-month period. Conclusions: The impact of the initial pandemicrelated disruptions in breast cancer care will have a small long-term cumulative impact on breast cancer mortality. The impact of the initial pandemic-related disruptions on breast cancer mortality will largely be mitigated by the rapid return to usual care. As the pandemic continues it will be important to monitor trends in care and reassess the mortality impact. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, swabs or other samples have increasingly been taken from the upper aero-digestive tract, since high viral loads exist here, especially in the early stages of the disease. As diagnostic options, swabs from the anterior nose, from the nasopharynx, from the oropharynx or the extraction of throat rinse water or saliva are possible. The laboratory methods available are antigen tests that can be read in a few minutes or more lengthy RT-PCR methods in a lab. Swabs are carried out by physicians, medical staff, laypeople and in the self-test, in each case according to prior instructions. Many of these factors therefore have an influence on the informative value and the sensitivity of the entire diagnostic process. The PCR laboratory method is more sensitive than the antigen method; the swabs from the nasopharynx are considered the most valid smear site; correct execution of a test can be achieved even with non-professional individuals with good instructions. Complications with such swabs are reported very rarely, given the assumed number of procedures performed. Short-term nosebleeds after traumatic smears can be assumed without publications about it being found. Broken parts of swabs had to be removed by an ENT doctor. There are only very few reports on injuries to the skullbase with CSF-leaks, including 2 times with anomalies such as meningoceles. The choice of a suitable diagnostic medium depends on many parameters such as availability, the timing of the result, a smear test by knowledgeable staff or a self-test, and a number of other practical considerations.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nasopharynx , Oropharynx , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Humans , Nasopharynx/virology , Oropharynx/virology , PandemicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: From spring 2020, SARS-CoV2 began to spread worldwide, with what is now known as the first wave of the pandemic, starting in March 2020. This resulted in restructuring and shift of resources at many hospitals. The aim of our work was to detect the effects of the pandemic on the german Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (ORL) university hospitals in terms of research, student teaching and further specialist training. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The chairmen of the 39 ORL university hospitals in Germany were asked about the effects of the pandemic on research, student teaching and ORL specialist training (residency) in the period from March to April 2020 using a structured online survey. RESULTS: All 39 chairmen took part in the survey. Of these, 74.4% (29/39) stated that their research activities had deteriorated as a result of the pandemic. In 61.5% (24/39) pandemic-related research issues were addressed. All hospitals reported a restriction for in-house teaching and 97.5% (38/39) introduced new digital teaching methods. During the observation period, 74.4% of the chairmen did not see ORL specialist training (residency)at risk. CONCLUSION: Our results provide an insight into the heterogeneous effects of the pandemic. The fast processing of pandemic-related research topics and the introduction of innovative digital concepts for student teaching impressively demonstrates the great innovative potential and the ability of the ORL university hospitals to react quickly in order to maintain their tasks in research, student teaching and ORL specialist training in the best possible way even during the pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Otolaryngology , Germany/epidemiology , Hospitals, University , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Students , TeachingABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Since December 2019, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been rapidly spreading worldwide. In Germany, an exponential increase in the number of infections was registered at the beginning of March 2020 and led to a call of the Ministry of Health to create more capacity for intensive medical treatment in hospitals. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (ORL) university hospitals regarding patient care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was sent out to all chairmen of the 39 ORL university hospitals in Germany. The answers to the questions referred to the defined period from March 15th to April 15th 2020 and were carried out using the online survey tool "SurveyMonkey". 87 questions focused on general information, health care, and structural effects in the respective institution. RESULTS: All chairmen of the 39 university hospitals in Germany participated in the survey. The collected data prove the considerable impact on organizational, structural and medical aspects of patient care. For example, the surveyed clinics reported a decrease in outpatient cases by 73.8â% to 26.2â±â14.2â% and in surgical treatments by 65.9â% to 34.1â±â13.9â%. In contrast, emergency treatment remained unchanged or even increased in 80â% of the facilities and surgical treatment of emergency patients remained unchanged or even increased in more than 90â%. Emergency outpatient and surgical treatment of patients was provided throughout the pandemic in all facilities. In total, about 35â000 outpatients and about 12â000 surgical cases were postponed. As a result of the acute structural changes, the potential danger of falling below current treatment standards was seen in individual areas of patient care. DISCUSSION: The assessment of the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is heterogeneous. The majority of the chairmen are critically aware of the risk of falling below current medical treatment standards or guidelines. In the phase of an exponential increase in the number of infections, significant changes in treatment processes had to be accepted for understandable reasons. However, with the currently significantly reduced number of infections, falling below treatment standards and guidelines should not be allowed to remain constant and tolerated. SUMMARY: This study shows a differentiated picture with regard to the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on outpatient, inpatient and operative patient care at the ORL university hospitals in Germany and illustrates the importance of these institutions for ensuring patient care during this critical phase.